|
More Information...
Full introduction to the accreditation program
How the accreditation program was
developed
In April 2001 Conservation Volunteers
Australia, on behalf of the Conservation
Volunteer Alliance, secured funding
from an Australian corporate sponsor
(RioTinto) for developing benchmarks
and an accreditation program for conservation volunteer organisations.
This is the first major project undertaken
by the
Conservation Volunteer Alliance
, and signals an immense opportunity
for the group to grow and begin delivering
significant benefits to each member
organisation.
In May 2001 Conservation Volunteers
Australia appointed Missing Link
Consultants to develop the Accreditation
Program. In developing the Program,
Missing Link undertook three rounds
of consultation with Alliance members,
including:
- A questionnaire
- to identify what aspects of
conservation volunteer activity
should be accredited and what
benefits should be created for accredited members.
- A draft
copy of the criteria
for members to practice
completing, and to provide comment
on.
- Visits to seven member organisations of the Alliance
- to discuss and improve
the Draft Program
- done by Missing Link
and Conservation Volunteers
Australia
- involving the Green
Balkans (Bulgaria), Legambiente
(Italy), British Trust
for Conservation Volunteers,
National Association of Service Conservation
Corps (USA), Environmental
Association for Senior Involvement
(USA),
the
National Mexican Conservation
Corps and Conservation
Volunteers Australia.
The
Draft Accreditation Program was
then reviewed and endorsed by the Executive
Board members of the Alliance
on 27th October 2001
(Rome, Italy). The Executive Board
then asked that Conservation Volunteers
Australia prepare a 'start-up plan'
to direct how to begin operating the accreditation
program.
The 'Start-up Plan'
aims to accredit at least
eight Alliance members
in the first year and another eight
in the second year.
Aim of the accreditation program
The accreditation program has been
created to assist continually improve
standards in conservation volunteer
organisations. The overall aim of the
accreditation program is therefore:
To assist organisations, professionally
deliver a high quality volunteer
experience and positive outcome
for the environment.
The Program aim will be achieved
by three objectives:
- Setting internationally agreed
standards for sound practice
- Providing
assistance for organisations to
improve to the agreed standards
- Using
the standards to confidently exchange
volunteers between organisations
The focus of the
accreditation program is on the practices
needed to provide a safe
and satisfying conservation volunteer
experience.
Types of organisations
that can apply
The accreditation program
will be open to financial
members of the Conservation
Volunteers Alliance. Membership of
the Alliance is open
to any organisation involved in developing,
delivering, coordinating
or representing conservation volunteer
activities. More detail
on membership eligibility can be
found within the membership section
of the Alliance website. The accreditation
program has been designed for two
types
of conservation volunteer
activity:
- Direct managers of
practical conservation
volunteers
(Conservation Volunteer
Project Management
Organisations)
- Representative
coordinators of conservation volunteer
organisations
(Umbrella Organisations)
Some organisations
do both activities,
and would therefore
apply for accreditation under both.
Type of accreditation
to apply for
To identify the type
of accreditation
to apply for, an
organisation needs to:
1. Identify the type
of conservation
volunteer activity your organisation
does, that is:
- Conservation Volunteer
Project Management
Organisations;
- Umbrella
Organisations;
or
- both.
2. Identify how
developed the
organisation
is, that is if it is:
- developing,
or
- benchmark.
Developing
organisations
have some
systems in place, and recognise
the need
for further improvement across most
parts of their
activity.
Developing organisations are
committed
to further
improving their
standards.
Benchmark
organisations
have
demonstrated systems in place across
all parts
of their
activity, backed up by comprehensive
skills
and experience. Benchmark organisations
are committed
to helping
developing
organisations
improve
their
standards.
Table
1 shows
the type of accreditation
to
apply for,
and the accreditation sections to
complete, depending
on
the type
of
conservation volunteer
activity
undertaken and how developed
the
organisation
is.
Table
1 Type
of accreditation to apply
for
and accreditation
sections
to complete
| Type of organisation |
Type of accreditation to apply for |
Organisational management
section |
Project management section |
Umbrella organisation
section |
Developing criteria |
Benchmark criteria |
Developing criteria
|
Benchmark criteria
|
Developing criteria
|
Benchmark criteria
|
| Developing Project Manager |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
| Developing Umbrella Organisation |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
| Developing Project Manager AND Umbrella Organisation |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
| Benchmark Project Manager |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
| Benchmark Umbrella Organisation |
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
| Benchmark Project Manager AND Umbrella Organisation |
|
X |
|
X |
|
X |
Purpose of each section of criteria
The organisational management criteria
are based on the need to maintain
a healthy and viable organisation. This would result in
fewer legal challenges from accidents, high
staff morale and lower staff turnover,
and a generally efficient business environment
The project management criteria are
based on the need to generate ongoing
volunteer confidence and support. This would result in
high volunteer satisfaction, high repeat participation
and high word-of-mouth recommendations.
The umbrella organisation criteria
are based on the need to efficiently
and comprehensively act as a
catalyst to assist conservation volunteer
project managers deliver programs. This would
result in high satisfaction, performance
and growth among members, affiliates and
subcontractors.
Proposed benefits for accredited Alliance members
There are five main benefits for accredited
members of the Alliance.
- Assistance to improve their standards;
- Increased opportunity
to exchange volunteers with other organisations;
- Access to funding for conservation volunteer programs and projects;
- Cooperative marketing to increase the potential to attract more
volunteers; and
- Collective international
lobbying to maintain resourcing support
for their organisation.
Assistance to improve practices
This benefit would involve accredited members
helping other accredited members to improve
their practices to the standards identified
in the accreditation program. This benefit
would primarily be directed to Developing accredited
members. Benchmark accredited members would
provide other accredited members with:
- examples of policies, plans and promotional
techniques (that are not confidential);
- training programs; and
- staff exchanges.
Basis for exchange of volunteers between organisations
Many Alliance members would like to expand
their programs by exchanging volunteers,
particularly volunteers from other countries.
The accreditation program would be used to
assure exchanging organisations that their
volunteers will be looked after in each others'
care. Two benchmark-accredited members would
have a relatively simple process to exchange
their volunteers. Developing accredited members
would require additional demonstration of capability,
before exchanging volunteers with a benchmark-accredited
member.
Access to funding for conservation volunteer programs and projects
This benefit would involve three types of funding
opportunities:
- Developing accredited members accessing
funding for improvement of practices
to meet the accreditation program standards.
- Benchmark accredited members accessing funding to assist developing
members
improve their practices.
- Benchmark accredited members also accessing special international
funding for conservation volunteer programs
funded by organisations
(such as the World Bank, European
Union
and Aid programs).
The first two types of funding could
come from a major corporate sponsor
or foundation, secured by the Alliance. The
third type of funding could come
from the Alliance approaching major funding organisations,
explaining the merits of the accreditation
program, and securing in principle
support for the
use of the accreditation program
as a filter to select the organisations with the greatest
ability
to deliver quality volunteer projects.
Cooperative marketing
This benefit would involve benchmark-accredited
members developing international promotions
to increase the reach of volunteer recruitment.
Examples of this could include:
- a special section of the Alliance website
for e-commerce;
- joint exhibitions and representation
at tourism trade shows;
- hyperlinks to each
others’ websites; and
- special programs targeted at particular
types of volunteers, such as students.
Collective international lobbying
This benefit would involve collective international
lobbying by the Alliance to maintain resourcing
support for accredited members. Possible
examples of this are:
- lobbying to restore a loss of financial
support for an accredited member from
one of its funding bodies;
- lobbying to restore
government support for an accredited member;
and
- lobbying to increase volunteer support
for an accredited member.
Other benefits
In addition to the benefits described above,
Developing and Benchmark accredited members
would be provided with an accreditation certificate
and an accreditation logo, for their
own use in promoting their accredited membership.
The certificate will state the accreditation
category and period of accreditation.
Accredited members should display the certificate
in their organisation’s
office for visitors to see. Accredited members should also include
their accreditation logo and a simple explanation of what their accreditation
means in their promotional material.
Another benefit that could be developed for Benchmark accredited members
is international insurance cover that is tailored to conservation volunteer
organisations and competitive with most alternatives currently available.
|